Friday, July 07, 2006

Cost of Labor

I walked into the muffler shop today and noticed the sign on the wall.

PRICE LIST

$40 an hour if we do the work.

$60 an hour if you watch us work.

$80 an hour if you help us work.

“Clever”, I mused, “that looks like a blog theme to me.” I then thought of the high cost of missions.

DOERS - Those who do the work are the people who have made a commitment to take on the task of cross-cultural service as a career. I can hardly believe how expensive it is to live in places like Mumbai, Kiev or Santiago. For a family of four a flat will can easily cost $1,000 a month. To do be engaged in the work overseas, along with taxes and insurance, you’re looking at least $50K a year. Financing the doers is not cheap, but still probably the most cost effective.

WATCHERS - Those who observe the work are short-term teams who travel overseas to experience ministry for two weeks or less. Take an average group of ten to fifteen people and the tab will easily be $30K. Glad they came, hope they caught the vision; the money they spent for the experience probably wouldn’t be given to missions anyway. Who knows, the 10 day trip might be a good investment in the long-term, but short-term missions is a program primarily for the watchers, they can’t really contribute much to the real work on the field.

INTRUDERS - Those who want to do the work are congregations who have determined that they want to be stakeholders in overseas ministry, though they don’t want to live on the field, learn a language or send their kids to local schools. By underwriting national programs, schools, orphanages, they will easily invest $100K a year, which includes teams going to the field, buying land and buildings. I know of one fellowship that has “adopted” a people group in Asia and is building a school, though they cannot mention the name of Christ nor even display a cross. Another congregation is involved in “harvest ministries,” which starts churches in Africa and Philippines by pouring thousands of dollars to reach those nations who already have a huge Christian population. Believing they can do better or maybe just a well, they by-pass the on-field doers.

Like the muffler shop, anyone of the three option’s one chooses will get the job done. It’s a matter of how much do you want to pay for the process to get the best results.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

As always, much food for thought. However, not all of us are called to be doers, nor all of us are watchers. The most disheartening category are the intruders. They sound like people who have good intentions and the means but no idea how to funnel it into the most "bang for the buck" (a bit like investing, don't you think...?) However, we are all part of the "same body of Christ." Each one called to follow his/her path that God has planned. I've known many "short-timers" who come back from trips, renewed, refreshed and spiritually 10 steps further down their path. These people often take those gifts and channel them into their own local church (which is a mission field of sorts) and encourage and incite others to join in. Are you aware that the Anglican church of Africa has identified the United States as the largest English speaking mission field in the world? I belong to one of their mission churches, supported by Africans of Rwanda. I empathize with the difficulty to raise the necessary funds to support individual missions/organizations, but I have seen God bless so many mission trips "at the final hour." Some of us just look a little closer to home for opportunities to serve.

Peace, K. Reyes

Anonymous said...

"Leave the driving to us!"

Greyhound long ago was a growing company because of a powerful business model and a logical service to provide. But changing times, inefficient operation, and alternative strategies caused most of the "watchers" and "intruders" to take a different approach from getting from point A to point B. Many "M" doers" have long ago ceased to "do" much of anything. But they have been in the bus station for so long, they still think they are the only means of good transportation of the gospel.

As always..it's Balance...it is not an either or proposition.

Thanks for doing what you do..Always enjoy the "blog"

Press on..Bill

RG Lewis said...

Two things I agree with (1) balance is important and (2) a lot of “doers” aren’t doing much. However, (a) Doers, like Greyhound Bus, are still on the road doing business while the Watchers and Intruders are as short-lived as the Segway scooters; (b) frustration with an old model does not always lead to effective strategy. Effectiveness is not a quick and easy fix. My bias is better Doers, both nationals as well as N. Americans. Watchers and Intruders has their role, but primarily to make the American church feel like they are doing something without getting their hands dirty.

Anonymous said...

ouch!

By the way, I'm transitioning my blogsite over to a "refreshed" site. Being on the "bestest" link isn't always what is best...Hope you don't mind the new link to your blog. I'll be shutting down my old blog soon.

Peace, K. Reyes

Anonymous said...

Ok, I'll jump into the fray: hmmm, cost effective missions....now that's a thought! So R.G., if I am following your line of thinking correctly, 'Intruders' would be more 'cost effective' if they invested their money AND their time closer to home. I suppose, then, American churches would become more like 'Doers' and the mission fields abroad would survive on fewer American dollars....?
Peace, K.Reyes

Anonymous said...

I'm not sure I agree with the "many" M doers statement -- SOME, certainly, but there are many, MANY M's who are just as committed and hard-working twenty-five years later as they were when they started, and I think it gives them the short-shrift to blithly lump them into the same catagory as a few ineffectives.

While I agree that some short-term missions have a great impact (quick in-and-out building trips that leave the church with new facilites being top on my list), I DO believe that a lot of times, the short-termers get much more out of the experience than the people they are supposed to be serving. They get the warm-fuzzies of calling themselves "M"s without actually having to commit their lives -- as Dr. Lewis says, "without getting their hands dirty." And I believe there is nothing wrong with short-termers getting their fuzzies -- as long as they don't deplete the funds of those who are there for the long haul. That's why I'm a firm believer in people giving up their precious skiing/sailing/cruise trips in order to do short-term missions, instead of expecting the church and their fellow church-members to foot the bill. Helping in a two-week clinic in Nigeria instead of going to the Bahama's? Now THAT'S sacrifice!!