There’s a fine line between being tolerant of others views yet holding to what we perceive to be truth. Those who have no strong opinions on issues berate those who do have an opinion, characterizing them as intolerant, at best, narrow minded bigots, at worse. Clearly one can be open to others opinion and gently agree to disagree. Depending on whether you are a radical open-minded person (who dismisses anyone who has a strong conviction about anything) or a radical closed-minded person (there is only one way correct answer, which is theirs), will determine whether there is room for dialogue. Example:
Wickets responded to one of my blogs (More Than Religion), stating he had a warm feeling toward Jesus, but had a poor opinion of Christianity. So far so good. I, too, have a poor opinion of institutional Christianity as some times it promotes the vehicle (church or denominationalism) of the message (Christ) than it does the Person (Jesus) of the message. This could be said of all institutional religion, Muslim, Hindu, and Buddhist.
Then Wickets said, “For me Jesus is as much sweet & benevolent as is Buddha... and more.” Ooops, we’ve crossed the line of tolerance to no man’s land of radical open-mindedness, i.e. situational ethics, relativism and the territory of whaaateverrrr.
As a follower of Jesus I would, of course, make a distinction between Jesus and Buddha. Actually the two are not in the same camp. Buddha taught self-enlightenment which leads to self-salvation. Jesus, however, taught that man’s salvation could never be attained through his own efforts. The whole reason Jesus came on the scene of the world was to provide salvation through His death and resurrection (I know it’s a strange story to non-believers, but I didn’t write the script, God did).
I realize that religion is divisive. Part of the reason is because of the fanaticism of the open and the closed minded. But a closer study of Jesus will reveal that he was a divisive personality. Heck, they nailed him to a cross because he told the world that he was the way, the truth and the life, and that if anyone wished to see God it would be through him. Jesus was hardly confused in who he was, nor was he very accommodating to those who disagreed with him. For over 2,000 years the person of Jesus continues to be divisive, especially to those who reject his claim or who preach the message of open-mindedness.
Tolerance is not open ended. The line of tolerance ends when a person becomes intolerant of those who hold a conviction of truth. Or, it ends when one seizes a conviction. You can say you love Jesus and Buddha, but in the sight of God, only one claimed to be His Christ. They are not mutually exclusive. Like loving two women, you have to choose one to be your wife…unless, of course, you can find a woman that is tolerant enough to allow you to love others at the same time. It doesn’t work that way on earth; it certainly doesn’t work that way in eternity.
5 comments:
Fabulous writing!!!!!... The # 1 religion in America, (indeed around the world) is humanism. It takes several different forms..some times in self-help, Buddhism, Islam or the Catholic Church..And, the idea of so many people who really believe "we may take different roads but we will all end up in the same place.." is a deceitful but comfortable feeling for 90% of the world.. Gina and I were talking this morning about "what we were BEFORE being SAVED and what we are today" 1 Corth:6:9-11.. A thought that most do not understand. The invasion of God in our Life THRU His Son Jesus..the marvelous gift and miracle of GRACE..
I have copied your article to send to some very nice people who I know.. They are great people.. But they are not SAVED... By bragging on you and your writing skills and sending them an example of your work, I pray that their hearts will be open to TRUTH.. Thanks for all you do for HIM.
Press on..Bill
Richard,
I have enjoyed reading the Blue Passport for some time now. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
In the last paragraph of this post, you wrote, "They are not mutually exclusive." Did you really mean that, or "They are mutually exclusive"? Given your illustration of loving two women, I think you meant the latter. If not, I'm confused.
Thanks for taking the time to write your thoughts.
Craig Dunning
Craig,
Thanks for the note. Since you were the second person to ask about "mutually exclusive," it's obvious I didn't state it clearly. Jesus and Buddha are not mutually exclusive, only Jesus. However, depending on how you read it, you could put both Buddha and Jesus in an exclusive category. Does this help, or just muddy the meaning more?
Bill, thanks for the encouragement.
RGL
Good morning Brother~in~law...
This is your "radical close~minded", sister~in~law, Regina.
I guess I am just too old and onery to be very tolerant these days. Especially when it comes to Jesus. He IS who HE is...NOT open for debate or even polite discussion...PERIOD, the END!
You are such a talented writer and I am so very proud (yes...Christians can be proud) to call you not only my brother~in~law...but my brother~IN~CHRIST.
Please give your lovely wife a big hug from me.
Lovingly,
Gina
Hey Pop,
Great illustration at the end - boom! Right on the ol' nail-head. Having former friends who call in the "slippery slope" argument whenever dissension appears, I sure appreciate a little black-and-white.
And Christ was NOT just a sweet, gentle guy - has that dude who said that ever read Revelations?
Rev. 1:16 "He had in His right hand seven stars, out of His mouth went a sharp-two edged SWORD, and His countenance was like the sun shinking in its strengh."
Then see what John does? "And when I saw Him, I fell at His feet as dead. But He laid His right hand on me, saying to me, "Do not be afraid; I am the First and the Last" (v. 17) This was JOHN - the beloved - even he was so afraid, he fell down in a near-faint!
Christ is a warrior - Matt. 10:34: "Do not think I came to bringe peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword." His coming shook up eternity - and it HAD to - when someone goes as far as to give His very life to save, you better believe it's going to create waves - TIDAL, in this case.
Great post, I am so proud of my smart dad.
Post a Comment