Syncretism of Form: Hindu Mantra’s and Christian Worship

After a fourteen-hour train ride I was tired, sweaty and needed a nap. The compound where I am teaching in Nasik, India, is a retreat center. The buildings are old, some dating back to when the British built them over 100 years ago. The bungalow is rustic, but clean. After my bucket bath I had just one hour to rest before the teaching sessions began. But I couldn’t sleep.

Less than 17 meters (50 yards) from my little room a local church youth group, probably 30 of them, were having a retreat. For the entire hour they chanted, sometimes with fervor, then dying down only to rise again, Halleluiah, HALLELUIAH, HALLELUIAH, HALLELUIAH…you get the picture. I was astounded that was all they did throughout my attempt to sleep. With hands clapping, it seemed there was a competition the girls and boys on who could shout the loudest. For one solid hour it was Halleluiah, HALLELUIAH, HALLELUIAH, HALLELUIAH. Nothing else.

I asked to my host later, “What is it with all the noise going on in that room?”

With a wry smile he said, “Baptist call it noise, others call it worship.” He did admit, however, they were extreme.

Fair enough. I get the point. On further reflection, however, the “noise” that troubled my rest I believe has a deeper missiological meaning, one that I have observed in Africa as well as India.

Form, the way people do things, is often culturally determined. How people assemble themselves around the table for supper, give and receive gifts, conduct business meetings, marriage ceremonies or bury the dead, all have a culturally prescribed form. Like “loan words,” (vocabulary borrowed from another language for communication, e.g. “safari” for travel, “daktari” for doctor or universal technological words used by all languages, i.e., Email or Internet), form of worship is often borrowed. Much of the form of Sunday morning Christian worship around the world is borrowed from the West. I can close my eyes in some churches in Delhi and hear the same praise songs I hear in the U.S. Even if the language is in Swahili, Hindi or Spanish the order of service is usually music, announcements, offering, special song and sermon. Churches that try to contextualize the form often do not move too far away from traditional/historical patterns.

Syncretism, of course, is contextualization that has crossed the line and adopts form from the host. In the Roman Catholic tradition they are often accused of syncretism in places like India who put a statute of Mary, or one of the saints, outside their churches for people to offer prayers. Across the street the Hindu’s offer prayers to statues of Shiva. With the form being same, is there a distinction in praying to idols.

Though unintended, the halleluiah chorus across from my hovel was not that different from the mantra’s of the Hindu’s. The constant repeating of a word or phrase is common to any Buddhist at their temples or the priest reciting prayers to Krishna. Do the mantras have power? Do the worshippers or God move closer to one another by the incessant repeating of words? I contend the separation of mantra of the Hindu and the Christian is so thin one could hardly discern the difference between the two.

Shouting has always been associated with casting out demons and evil spirits. The witchdoctors have been doing it for centuries, as they believe that forceful speech is the only way the spirits will respond. Power is in the chants and the more vigorous the presentation the greater the chances for overcoming evil.

I am well aware that those who hold tightly to these forms of display will disagree with this post, just as those who maintain dead liturgy continue to embrace their form of worship. I am a proponent of contextualization, but I suggest that some of the forms used here in India look and sound too much like those who venerate the gods of stone.

Is Church Growth In India An Obstacle In Reaching The Masses?

In the most recent issue of Christianity Today, Tim Stafford writes about church growth in India. The premise of his article is that the growing church is primarily among the Dalits (formerly known as "outcastes" or "untouchables,"), Other Backward Castes (OBC's) and tribal people. Stafford’s article seems to lose focus as he ends up talking about a mission hospital in the North as well as the large population of Christians in the Northeast. There are interesting statistics but, like so many such articles, numbers are sometimes guesstimates rather than reliable data. I always appreciate, however, the focus on India and missions and encourage my readers to go to this CT link as well as the YouTube clip.

My problem with this, and so many articles about church growth in India, is that it misses the larger issue of Christianity in the sub-continent. Eighty percent of the population is Hindu, fifteen percent are Muslims. Reporting that there are possibly 70 million Christians in the country, though impressive and certainly something that we Christians rejoice over, still ignores the reality that MOST of the Indian population is not being reached and there is no real strategy on how to penetrate the Hindu, Muslim, Jain or Sikh population.

One of the comments to Stafford’s article sums up the problem…Hindu’s see Dalit conversion as exploitation and a Western approach to human rights. My landlord in Delhi for four years had a disdain for Christian evangelists, as he perceived their efforts as manipulation, not a seeking after truth. Even if an upper caste Hindu, successful business professional or an educated Indian was interested in the claims of Christ, they would turn away from further investigation because the face of Jesus, as a group of Christians professionals once confessed to me, is an image of a Dalit.

The only way that Christ will be accepted by the masses in India is through a truly contextualized approach, i.e. Christ following Muslims reaching Muslims, upper caste followers of our Lord being a witness to their Hindu friends and family. Progress on this front is happening, but at a much slower pace.

Jesus was more popular with the outcastes (tax collectors, lepers, the blind) than the acceptable and respected religious leaders of his day. Some things don’t change. The caste system in India is a cultural prison that the privileged will always embrace over honest dialogue. While we are grateful that Christ is indeed the answer for the oppressed, understand that progress among the few does not translate into a mass movement to all.

Anthropology of Religion: Polytheism and Animism

Polytheism is the belief or worship of many gods/goddesses. Pantheism is the belief that many objects could possess certain powers, e.g. a tree, animals, river. Animism concludes that spiritual powers reside in inanimate objects like the wind, rock or clouds.

In all religions we find animistic practices, even in monotheistic religions of Christianity and Islam. In a India, a polytheistic religion that claim there at least 330 million deities, one can easily see a combination of practices of animism and even pantheism, as show in these clips below.

The first is a shrine, built to a deity, which I filmed on the side of the road outside the city of Nagpur.

In the center of Kota, Rajasthan there is a tree, which the people seemingly believe has some spiritual significance. Not only do they have garlands of devotion on the tree, but also have pictures of the greater gods of Shiva and Vishnu tacked to this tree.